Straight from the Heart Sucks Customer Reviews and Feedback

From Everything.Sucks

Straight from the Heart is a 2003 American made-for-television romantic drama film starring Teri Polo, Andrew McCarthy, Patricia Kalember and Greg Evigan. The film is based on the romance novel by Pamela Wallace and premiered on Hallmark Channel on February 9, 2003.

A dissapointed viewer shares some thoughts about ¨Straight from the Heart¨, "I enjoy Andrew McCarthy, and he has aged fabulously, but this movie made me cringe nearly the entire time I was watching it-- and I'm a romance buff who has seen and read a lot of pretty saccharine stuff! While one wants to feel sympathy for his character and the troubles he has been through, the tired, trite stoicism makes it difficult to care, and the reactions and lines of some of the supporting characters-- Edward, Laurie, etc.-- are also stock sugar, predictable to the very end.

The conflicts of the movie are sparing at best and ill-resolved, and there's a continued attempt at some sort of suspense that falls horribly flat as it falters toward the end. The backdrop of this movie is beautiful, and Andrew McCarthy has never looked better, but on the whole, the storyline and its boring, yawning turns were not up to par."

Reviews

Tell the world why Straight from the Heart sucks!
CLICK TO RATE

I certify that this review is based on my own experiece and is my opinion of this person or business. I have not been offered any incentive or payment to write this review.

Refresh

Enter Code

Former Temporary Employee - Senior Administrative Assistant says

"I worked at UNHCR for more than a year Cons: Poor contractual benefits , hostile environment"

Flight Attendant (Current Employee) says

"高層做錯決定,前線承受 Cons: 太多"

Customer Service Representative (Former Employee) says

"Working at Cathay pacific was very stressful. When u needed help from supervisors u never got it I was tolded to handle situations myself but when they went on social media I was blamed for not asking supervisors for help. Double standards. Management expected me to be at 2 different places at once. I haven't work for a bad Management company like this one in my whole life. Also they would talk in their language right in front of me about me, which is not acceptable. Cons: Long hours. Not long enough break. Low pay."

customer relations executive (Former Employee) says

"I was called for an interview only later to know that it was just a formality. Not selected even after knowing thier systems and having experience. Cx is hopeless"

Passenger Service Agent (Former Employee) says

"Managers sucked selfish and dont care for you immature if you are not asian you dont fit in you do things on your own no one helps rude ppl all around and very low pay for such rich company only good thing coworkers made it fun but not the passengers Cons: Everythinh"

Engineer (Current Employee) says

"This is the worse company to work for manager lie constantly, the pay lowest in the airport , staff morale low. Cutting cost, cutting benefits basically they want you to work for free if they had there way. Get told by management if you to progress in your career or want to earn reasonable money leave Cathay but then on the other hand they tell you before you leave just remember you work for 5 star airline . Absloute disgrace how staff are treated. On the plus side colleague I work are top . YOU WILL HEAR ABOUT THE COMPANY MOTIVE TIME TO WIN means the company would like for you to give, give, give in return you get nothing as they have no money. Cons: Management lie constantly"

Manager (Former Employee) says

"- three meeting everyday."

Ex Employee of cathay pacific delhi engineering (Former Employee) says

"Delhi Engineering Manager is too harsh and political/Dubble Standard Cons: loose self respect"

n/a (Former Employee) says

"Cathay pacific is known for age discrimination, and now it's carrying its adverse culture to sfo."

Professional (Former Employee) says

"big company, good perks, good benefits"

Customer Service Agent (Former Employee) says

"Salary- Minimum pay, more skills won’t get more pay Cons: Less chance to get higher position and more salary"

Manager on Duty (Current Employee) says

"Learned Ramp Management and Aircraft Loading Management. Cons: Late Night hours"

Aircraft Technician (Former Employee) says

"its a 5 star airline but really worst management. On delhi base employees are mentally harrased. No job security. employees can be kicked off any time"

Aircraft Technician (Current Employee) says

"The Perfect place to get your foot in the door. Other then that, they offer nothing else. Do not join thinking it’s a step up unless you are a trainee. Cons: No progression, one sided deaf management, poor company ethics"

Flight Attendant (Current Employee) says

"No career movement even if you are a top performer, no recognition for any hard work. Cons: Too many to list"

PSO (Former Employee) says

"No options to advance, salary low compared to other similar positions with different companies. They put a lot of pressure on the employees and expect a lot, however not giving much back, other than your salary. Continuously reducing and withdrawing benefits. Management never backs up staff. Cons: no option for advancment, very little benefits and low salary"

Flight Attendant (Current Employee) says

"- Super low pay. Cons: poor management, low pay."

Sales (Former Employee) says

"they only want to use you. they believe people are robots and can work nonstop. they will change your schedule overnight and not care about your life at all."

Aircraft Mechanic (Former Employee) says

"Constantly under pressure to perform because the boss is a slave driver. Doesn't want to see anybody taking a little breather. But other than that it is a very challenging place of work"

Technical Services Engineer (Current Employee) says

"Senior management only focuses on cost cutting, without considering any long term investment, for instance, IT system and develop in-house talents / specialists. Cons: Poor management"

Pilot (Current Employee) says

"You will become a liability to this company the longer you stay as they are one of the few airlines that do not use a seniority based redundancy system. They prefer to discard employees who have worked tirelessly and performed exceptionally once they advance so that costs are kept low. Promised salaries and work conditions are arbitrarily and illegally changed by forcing employees to accept poorer terms or else face (legal) dismissal. Current practice is to pay a fluctuating hourly wage that can be changed at any time, which is based on productivity. Due to being massively over-staffed a fair monthly income can never be achieved. Their headquarters are located in the world's most expensive city for expats, a city that has poor labour protections, poor freedoms and tiny and extremely expensive housing. They often seek to divide different employee groups and create conflict so that infighting distracts from the reductions to pay and benefits. They enforce a ban on free speech imposed by the government. Expressing an opinion, even if respectful can get you fired. Cons: Dishonest managment, no job security even for high performing staff"

Social Media

In The News